Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Coron Artery Dis ; 34(8): 562-579, 2023 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37865864

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of bivalirudin-based anticoagulation over heparin-based anticoagulation for coronary percutaneous intervention has been debated for a long time. Multiple trials have shown promising benefits of bivalirudin over heparin therapy with the most recent addition being the BRIGHT-4 trial. We performed a meta-analysis to assess evidence from these trials, focusing on the coronary intervention of the STEMI population. METHODS: This meta-analysis was performed based on PRISMA guidelines after registering in PROSPERO (CRD42023394701). Databases were searched for relevant articles published before January 2023. Pertinent data from the included studies were extracted and analyzed using RevMan v5.4. RESULTS: Out of 2375 studies evaluated, 13 randomized control trials with 24 360 acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients were included for analysis. The bivalirudin-based anticoagulation reduced the net clinical events (OR 0.75, CI 0.61-0.92), major adverse cardiac or cerebral events (OR 0.85, CI 0.74-0.98), any bleeding (OR 0.61, CI 0.45-0.83), major bleeding (OR 0.54, CI 0.39-0.75), all-cause mortality (OR 0.79, CI 0.67-0.92) and cardiac mortality (OR 0.78, CI 0.65-0.93) significantly without increasing the risk of any stent thrombosis (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.52-1.61), definite stent thrombosis (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.62-2.22) and acute stent thrombosis (OR 2.06, 95% CI 0.69-6.09) significantly at 30 days. CONCLUSION: Based on this meta-analysis, bivalirudin plus a post-PCI high-dose infusion-based anticoagulation during STEMI PCI has significant benefits over heparin therapy for cardiovascular outcomes without a significant increase in the risk of thrombotic outcomes.


Assuntos
Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Trombose , Humanos , Heparina/efeitos adversos , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/tratamento farmacológico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/etiologia , Antitrombinas/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Hirudinas/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/efeitos adversos , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Proteínas Recombinantes/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
2.
Health Sci Rep ; 6(7): e1391, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37404451

RESUMO

Background and Aims: Cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices are employed to capture embolic debris and reduce the risk of stroke during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Evidence is mixed regarding the safety and efficacy of CEP. We aimed to summarize the safety and effectiveness of CEP use during TAVR. Methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase, were searched using relevant search terms for articles relating to CEP. All relevant data from 20 studies were extracted into a standardized form. Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.4. Odds ratio (OR) or mean differences (MDs) were used to estimate the desired outcome with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Twenty studies (eight randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) involving 210,871 patients (19,261 in the CEP group and 191,610 in TAVR without the CEP group) were included. The use of CEP was associated with a lower odds of 30-day mortality by 39% (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.53-0.70) and stroke by 31% (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.92). Comparing devices, benefit in terms of mortality and stroke was observed with the use of the Sentinel device (Boston Scientific), but not among other devices. No differences were observed in the outcomes of acute kidney injury, major or life-threatening bleeding events, or major vascular complications between groups. When only RCTs were included, there were no observed differences in the primary or secondary outcomes for CEP versus no CEP use during TAVR. Conclusions: The totality of evidence suggests a net benefit for the use of CEP, weighted by studies in which the Sentinal device was used. However, given the RCT subanalysis, additional evidence is needed to identify patients at the highest risk of stroke for optimal decision-making.

3.
Cureus ; 15(2): e35447, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36994275

RESUMO

Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease caused by a bacterium, Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It is known to generally affects the lungs, but it can also affect multiple other parts of the body. Liver involvement with hepatic abscess is an infrequent manifestation of TB which is missed because of the rarity and non-specific symptoms, especially in the west. A thorough literature review shows very few case reports published in the western world. We present a rare case of isoniazid-resistant pulmonary TB associated with a hepatic abscess in the United States. It was diagnosed by aspiration of the abscess that later grew M. tuberculosis and treated with antitubercular drugs.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...